Skip to content
ZAKHORIUM

Date

701BCE

701 BCE

Assyria took much of Judah and Lachish, but Jerusalem did not fall; biblical and Assyrian sources explain the outcome differently.

Political history31.5649°N 34.8492°E
1200 BCE
1100 BCE
1000 BCE
900 BCE
800 BCE
700 BCE
600 BCE
Ancient Israel and Other Ancestors: each bar is an event of the period; this one is in coral.

Sourced narrative

Each block is a verifiable statement. The number opens the cited page; amber or coral blocks flag tradition or contested interpretation.

6 statements

Statements for this event

03

A few decades later Sennacherib's Assyria also conquered Judah, an episode in 2 Kings 18 and 19 that external evidence partly corroborates. Verses 18:13 and 14 say Sennacherib captured every fortified Judahite city, while Hezekiah contacted him at Lachish and paid three hundred silver talents and thirty gold talents.

04

Sennacherib's own annals say, in compatible terms, that Hezekiah did not submit, that he besieged 46 fortified cities and countless villages, deported 200,150 people along with their animals and treated the rest as booty, and that he shut Hezekiah up in Jerusalem 'like a bird in a cage'.

02

Contested interpretation

Sennacherib did not destroy Jerusalem, as the Assyrians had done with Samaria, perhaps because Hezekiah agreed to pay a fine, as 2 Kings 18:14 says. But the Bible says what saved the city was divine intervention: an angel struck down 185,000 Assyrian soldiers, and Sennacherib went home. None of this is in the Assyrian version, which describes a typical victory. Each author had reasons to give his own account: the biblical one stresses God's power; the Assyrian one, Sennacherib's.

05

The Kingdom of Judah survived the Assyrian conquest because, for whatever reason, the Assyrians left it standing, even if reduced: they destroyed many cities and seized much territory but never destroyed Jerusalem itself.

Context

Assyrian domination is well attested archaeologically, with destruction layers, inscriptions and building remains, and left a deep mark on biblical literature: much of the prophetic literature (Isaiah, Amos, Micah) comes from the Assyrian period and records fear, confusion and resentment. It interprets the conquest as divine punishment but also holds out God coming to the rescue, as in Isaiah 10:24 to 27.

§ 01Geography

Where it happened

Gazetteer coordinates (Pleiades for ancient places; Natural Earth and Wikidata for modern ones) over modern physical geography (Natural Earth). Coastlines and the Dead Sea have changed since antiquity.
▮ loading geography

§ 02Museum

Objects and images

Each item states whether it is an ancient object, a modern photograph or a later artistic interpretation.

§ 03Historiography

What scholars debate

Positions shown side by side, unranked, as the source reports them. The source’s own assessment appears separately.

Scholarly debate · 01

Why did Jerusalem survive the Assyrian campaign of 701 BCE?

2 positions · no single answer · take a seat →

  1. A

    Divine deliverance

    Biblical account

    A divine agent is said to have struck the Assyrian army and protected the city.

  2. B

    A typical Assyrian victory

    Sennacherib's account

    After destroying Judah's other cities and forts, Sennacherib says he shut Hezekiah up in Jerusalem "like a bird in a cage", without taking the city. The Bible itself (2 Kings 18:14) mentions Hezekiah paying a fine, and the authors suggest this may be why the city was spared.

The source’s assessmentBoth sources agree that Judah was devastated and Jerusalem remained standing, while offering incompatible propaganda about why.

§ 04Network

Connections

§ 05Bibliography

Further reading

  • James B. Pritchard, Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969).

    Translations of ancient Near Eastern sources · recommended in Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 32

§ 06Apparatus

Sources on this page

  1. 01Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 13; Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 519inspect
  2. 02Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 23; Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 23inspect
  3. 03Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 22; Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 22inspect
  4. 04Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 22; Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 23inspect
  5. 05Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 26inspect
  6. 06Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 23; Efron, Lehmann and Weitzman, p. 23inspect
  • Documented evidenceAttested by contemporary evidence: texts, inscriptions, coins, papyri or archaeology.
  • Scholarly reconstructionHistorians' inference from indirect evidence.
  • Tradition or narrativeA literary, traditional or religious account; significant in itself, but not independently verified.
  • Contested interpretationScholars explicitly disagree; see the positions in the debate.
  • Illustrative reconstructionA hypothesis or visual scheme to guide reading; not a historical claim.