Date
1536CE
1536–1821
The Portuguese Holy Office, won after a long dispute with Rome, pursued New Christians in the kingdom and in colonial Brazil.
Sourced narrative
Each block is a verifiable statement. The number opens the cited page; amber or coral blocks flag tradition or contested interpretation.
6 statements
01Evidence and context
On 23 May 1536 a bull of Paul III established the Holy Office tribunal in Portugal.
The Portuguese tribunal emerged from a contest between Church and state interests.
John III faced prolonged Curia resistance before securing the definitive Inquisition bull.
John III reinforced the law barring New Christians from leaving Portugal, even under papal pressure.
For New Christians accused of Judaism, the most common sentence was imprisonment and perpetual penitential habit.
In Brazil, New Christians accused of Judaism could receive a death sentence at the stake.
Context
The Portuguese tribunal emerged from a contest between Church and state interests.
John III faced prolonged Curia resistance before securing the definitive Inquisition bull.
John III reinforced the law barring New Christians from leaving Portugal, even under papal pressure.
For New Christians accused of Judaism, the most common sentence was imprisonment and perpetual penitential habit.
§ 01Geography
Where it happened
§ 04Network
Connections
§ 05Bibliography
Further reading
Anita Novinsky, "O Tribunal da Inquisição em Portugal", Revista USP 5 (São Paulo, 1987): 91–98 (originally Folhetim, Folha de S. Paulo, 15 May 1987).
The Portuguese Inquisition and New Christians · recommended in Novinsky, p. 91
§ 06Apparatus
Sources on this page
- 01Novinsky, p. 91inspect
- 02Novinsky, p. 92inspect
- 03Novinsky, p. 91inspect
- 04Novinsky, p. 91inspect
- 05Novinsky, p. 96inspect
- 06Novinsky, p. 92inspect
- Documented evidenceAttested by contemporary evidence: texts, inscriptions, coins, papyri or archaeology.
- Scholarly reconstructionHistorians' inference from indirect evidence.
- Tradition or narrativeA literary, traditional or religious account; significant in itself, but not independently verified.
- Contested interpretationScholars explicitly disagree; see the positions in the debate.
- Illustrative reconstructionA hypothesis or visual scheme to guide reading; not a historical claim.